ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
R. Böhme, H. Seufert
Nuclear Technology | Volume 7 | Number 6 | December 1969 | Pages 494-504
Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28368
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An absolute determination of uranium reaction rates by means of foil irradiation was carried out in the Fast Zero Power Reactor SNEAK, assembly 3A-2 This requires the measurement of reactionrate traverses as well as their fine structure. These rate distributions were compared with transport and diffusion calculations. The traverse measurements indicate a strong dependence of the axial “buckling” (relative second derivative of the rates) on energy. The calculations with the Karlsruhe SNEAK cross-section set and the Russian ABN set yield these bucklings for 238U capture and 235U fission in diffusion approximation on the average 5% higher than measured. Only the fast-fission rate distribution of 238U is almost correctly calculated using the cross-section sets. The ratio of total plutonium production to 235u fission along the z axis was measured and compared with theory. It agrees within the error limits of the experiment. Beyond the error limits are the discrepancies found for the spectral index σƒ28/σƒ25 The fine structure of reaction rates within the fuel platelets is well described by an integral transport code, but again, there are considerable discrepancies between calculated and measured fission-rate ratios.