ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Growing the nuclear talent in Texas
The University of Texas–Austin has released a report, Cultivating Homegrown Nuclear Talent in Texas: Workforce Development Recommendations for Advanced Nuclear Development, which emphasizes general actions needed for the state to meet the near-term demand for workers in the nuclear industry.
R. Böhme, H. Seufert
Nuclear Technology | Volume 7 | Number 6 | December 1969 | Pages 494-504
Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28368
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An absolute determination of uranium reaction rates by means of foil irradiation was carried out in the Fast Zero Power Reactor SNEAK, assembly 3A-2 This requires the measurement of reactionrate traverses as well as their fine structure. These rate distributions were compared with transport and diffusion calculations. The traverse measurements indicate a strong dependence of the axial “buckling” (relative second derivative of the rates) on energy. The calculations with the Karlsruhe SNEAK cross-section set and the Russian ABN set yield these bucklings for 238U capture and 235U fission in diffusion approximation on the average 5% higher than measured. Only the fast-fission rate distribution of 238U is almost correctly calculated using the cross-section sets. The ratio of total plutonium production to 235u fission along the z axis was measured and compared with theory. It agrees within the error limits of the experiment. Beyond the error limits are the discrepancies found for the spectral index σƒ28/σƒ25 The fine structure of reaction rates within the fuel platelets is well described by an integral transport code, but again, there are considerable discrepancies between calculated and measured fission-rate ratios.