ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
BREAKING NEWS: Trump issues executive orders to overhaul nuclear industry
The Trump administration issued four executive orders today aimed at boosting domestic nuclear deployment ahead of significant growth in projected energy demand in the coming decades.
During a live signing in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump called nuclear “a hot industry,” adding, “It’s a brilliant industry. [But] you’ve got to do it right. It’s become very safe and environmental.”
Merril Eisenbud
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 2 | October 1989 | Pages 514-519
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Health Physics and Environmental Release / Radiation Biology and Environment | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27746
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Destruction of the core of Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) resulted in the release of large quantities of primary coolant into the reactor, auxiliary, and fuel handling buildings. Volatile fission products, mainly noble gases, with lesser amounts of radioiodines, escaped into the plant atmosphere and were discharged to the environment via the stack from the plant ventilation system. The contaminated water was retained within the buildings, from which no uncontrolled releases occurred. Radiation monitoring personnel from several government agencies and national laboratories were quickly assembled at TMI-2. The data they collected were analyzed by specialists from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; the national laboratories operated by the U.S. Department of Energy; the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. These efforts made it possible to develop estimates of the dose received by the maximally exposed individual and the collective dose received by the more than two million people who lived within 80.5 km from the plant. The collective dose estimates ranged from 28 to 35 person-Sv (2800 to 3500 person-rem). The maximum dose to any individual was estimated to be <1 mSv (100 mrem). Essentially all of the off-site collective dose was due to the release of ∼370 PBq (10 million Ci) of noble gases. In addition, <1.1 TBq (30 Ci) of 131I and 0.148 TBq (4 Ci) of 133I are estimated to have been released to the atmosphere, with small amounts of other radionuclides released to the Susquehanna River. When accepted risk coefficients are applied to the estimates of collective dose, it is concluded that no radiation-induced cancers would be expected to occur in the lifetime of the exposed population.