ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Edward N. Lazo
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 2 | October 1989 | Pages 407-420
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Health Physics and Environmental Release / Radioactive Waste Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27730
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In March 1982, the gross decontamination experiment was conducted in the Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor building (RB). The intent of the experiment was twofold: (a) to determine which of several commonly used decontamination techniques would be the most efficient at reducing contamination levels on vertical and horizontal surfaces and (b) to actually reduce radiation and surface contamination levels in the accessible areas of the RB to reduce person-rem expenditures for future entries. Accessible areas included the entire RB except inside the D-rings, inside the enclosed stairwell, and the 282-ft elevation. The experiment consisted of six separate tasks that were implemented in nine different major work segments (work packages), accomplished during 15 RB entries over a 30-day period. Approximately 0.4 person-Sv was expended in completing the experiment. In spite of operational deviations from the original plan and the lack of emphasis on pre- and posttest data acquisition, the average RB contamination levels dropped by a factor of 10 and the most effective decontamination techniques were determined. Decontamination factors 1 to ∼125 were seen.