ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
Andrew P. Hull
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 2 | October 1989 | Pages 383-394
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Health Physics and Environmental Release / Radiation Biology and Environment | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27728
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Although the advance planning for it was minimal by today’s standards, a large integrated federal and state environmental monitoring response was made to the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident. In particular, major resources were committed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). They include the Brookhaven National Laboratory-based Radiological Assistance Program, the Atmospheric Release Advisory Capability, and the Aerial Measurements System, with backup personnel from other DOE national laboratories. Additional resources were provided by the Environmental Protection Agency. The monitoring effort included plume tracking, field environmental monitoring and sampling, sample analysis, and dose assessment. The ranges of the installed plant monitors having been exceeded, these data were important for establishing the nuclides and their quantities in the daily releases from the plant during the first few weeks after the accident. In particular, it was established that the continuing releases consisted almost entirely of radiogases, with very small quantities of radioiodines. The highest measured ground-level dose rate was 1.3 × 102 C/kg (50 mR/h) and the largest concentration of 131I <3.7 × 10−6 Bq/cm3 (<1 × 10−10 µCi/cm3). From DOE population dose assessment, the highest individual dose appears to have been <1 mSv/h (<100 mR/h) and the total population dose 20 person-Sv (∼2000 person-rems). This largely ad hoc response became the basic model for today’s Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Program, which would be put into operation should a major accident occur at a U.S. nuclear facility.