ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Swiss nuclear power and the case for long-term operation
Designed for 40 years but built to last far longer, Switzerland’s nuclear power plants have all entered long-term operation. Yet age alone says little about safety or performance. Through continuous upgrades, strict regulatory oversight, and extensive aging management, the country’s reactors are being prepared for decades of continued operation, in line with international practice.
Gary L. Thinnes, Richard L. Moore
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 4 | December 1989 | Pages 1036-1049
Late Paper | TMI-2: Decontamination and Waste Management / Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27695
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident resulted in the melting of ∼47% of the reactor core and the relocation of ∼15% of the core onto the lower head of the reactor vessel. The severity of the accident has raised questions about the margin of safety against rupture of the reactor vessel lower head in this accident since all evidence seems to indicate no major breach of the vessel occurred. Scoping heat transfer analyses of the relocated core debris and lower head have been made based on assumed core melting scenarios and core material debris formations while in contact with the lower head. The structural finite element creep rupture analysis of the lower head using a temperature transient that was judged to be a challenge to the structural capacity of the reactor vessel is described. This evaluation of vessel response to the imposed temperature transient has provided insight into the creep mechanisms of the vessel wall, a realistic mode of failure, and a means by which margin to failure can be evaluated once examination provides estimated maximum wall temperatures. Suggestions for more extensive research in this area are also provided.