ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
BREAKING NEWS: Trump issues executive orders to overhaul nuclear industry
The Trump administration issued four executive orders today aimed at boosting domestic nuclear deployment ahead of significant growth in projected energy demand in the coming decades.
During a live signing in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump called nuclear “a hot industry,” adding, “It’s a brilliant industry. [But] you’ve got to do it right. It’s become very safe and environmental.”
Clay M. Davis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 4 | December 1989 | Pages 778-785
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Decontamination and Waste Management / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27671
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The March 28, 1979, loss-of-coolant accident at Three Mile Island Unit 2 resulted in the exposure of ∼3000 m2 of reactor building (RB) internal concrete surfaces to both liquid- and vapor-borne contaminants. The period of contact between these surfaces and aqueous solutions of mixed fission products ranged from a few days to several years. At the completion of gross decontamination of the accessible elevations of the RB in 1982 by water flushing, high-pressure spraying, strippable coating application, and hands-on wiping, dose rates remained above expected levels. Surveys and limited surface sampling indicated that contaminants had penetrated the protective coatings on the structural concrete, creating a substantial fixed source. To assess the depth of contaminant penetration into the concrete, a sampling program was conducted in September 1983. Based on the results of this program, it was determined that where coatings were intact, penetration past the matrix of the coating was insignificant. Where the coatings had been damaged prior to the accident, however, penetrations into the concrete were observed up to 20 mm. Subsequent modeling using the ISOSHLD II code using these values indicated that between 23 and 40% of the 1983 observed dose rates could be attributed to this source. Coatings removal tests conducted on the samples demonstrated that removal of the coatings could result in the removal of between 50 and 98% of the activity. Subsequent to this work, coatings and concrete removal on the accessible upper elevations of the RB resulted in dose reductions of 15 to 38%. These data, and that of subsequent work in the RB basement, indicate that protective coatings applied to structural concrete substantially reduce the degree to which the substrate will be penetrated by aqueous contaminant solutions. Relative to the ability to successfully remove absorbed contamination, the coating matrix containing the major fraction of the radionuclide load may be removed with less aggressive effort than that required to remove a potentially larger volume of contaminated concrete.