ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Swiss nuclear power and the case for long-term operation
Designed for 40 years but built to last far longer, Switzerland’s nuclear power plants have all entered long-term operation. Yet age alone says little about safety or performance. Through continuous upgrades, strict regulatory oversight, and extensive aging management, the country’s reactors are being prepared for decades of continued operation, in line with international practice.
P. Greebler, B. A. Hutchins, R. B. Linford
Nuclear Technology | Volume 4 | Number 5 | May 1968 | Pages 297-306
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A26395
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The uncertainties in physics parameters and in fuel cost of fast power reactors due to current nuclear data uncertainties are considered for two sodium-cooled, oxide-fueled, 1000 MW(e) reactors. One reactor has a low core neutron leakage and a core composition that results in very low fuel cost and short doubling time for fissile material. The second reactor is forced to satisfy stringent safety criteria associated with the sodium voiding reactivity problem and, hence, has a high core neutron leakage and a large amount of moderating material (BeO) in its core composition, with resultant higher fuel cost. Ranges in uncertainties in fuel cost and doubling time for each recognized significant data uncertainty over a “correlated” energy interval are evaluated for each of the two reactors, using the highest and the lowest reasonable values of that nuclear data parameter, as well as the values recommended in the Brookhaven Evaluated Nuclear Data Files (ENDF/B). Combined uncertainties in data produce an uncertainty of ∼0.15 mill/kWh in fuel cost for the low leakage reactor and 0.25 mill/kWh for the reactor for which the design composition (BeO content) must be adjusted as the nuclear data are varied, in order to satisfy the stringent sodium voiding safety criteria. The current large uncertainty in the value of α for 239Pu below 15 keV is the largest single contributor to this overall fuel cost uncertainty, closely followed by the uncertainties in for 239Pu and σc(σc = σn,y) for 238U. On the basis of the calculated sensitivity of fuel cost to specific data uncertainties, a set of targets for nuclear data accuracy that would reduce the calculated fuel cost uncertainty to about ±0.03 mill/kWh is recommended.