ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
P. Greebler, B. A. Hutchins, R. B. Linford
Nuclear Technology | Volume 4 | Number 5 | May 1968 | Pages 297-306
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A26395
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The uncertainties in physics parameters and in fuel cost of fast power reactors due to current nuclear data uncertainties are considered for two sodium-cooled, oxide-fueled, 1000 MW(e) reactors. One reactor has a low core neutron leakage and a core composition that results in very low fuel cost and short doubling time for fissile material. The second reactor is forced to satisfy stringent safety criteria associated with the sodium voiding reactivity problem and, hence, has a high core neutron leakage and a large amount of moderating material (BeO) in its core composition, with resultant higher fuel cost. Ranges in uncertainties in fuel cost and doubling time for each recognized significant data uncertainty over a “correlated” energy interval are evaluated for each of the two reactors, using the highest and the lowest reasonable values of that nuclear data parameter, as well as the values recommended in the Brookhaven Evaluated Nuclear Data Files (ENDF/B). Combined uncertainties in data produce an uncertainty of ∼0.15 mill/kWh in fuel cost for the low leakage reactor and 0.25 mill/kWh for the reactor for which the design composition (BeO content) must be adjusted as the nuclear data are varied, in order to satisfy the stringent sodium voiding safety criteria. The current large uncertainty in the value of α for 239Pu below 15 keV is the largest single contributor to this overall fuel cost uncertainty, closely followed by the uncertainties in for 239Pu and σc(σc = σn,y) for 238U. On the basis of the calculated sensitivity of fuel cost to specific data uncertainties, a set of targets for nuclear data accuracy that would reduce the calculated fuel cost uncertainty to about ±0.03 mill/kWh is recommended.