ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
DOE fast tracks test reactor projects: What to know
The Department of Energy today unveiled 10 companies racing to bring test reactors online by next year to meet Trump's deadline of next Independance Day, leveraging a new DOE pathway that allows reactor authorization outside national labs. As first outlined in one of the four executive orders on nuclear energy released by President Trump on May 23 and in the request for applications for the Reactor Pilot Program released June 18, the companies must use their own money and sites—and DOE authorization—to get reactors operating. What they won’t need is a Nuclear Regulatory Commission license.
J. A. Vitti, P. K. Doherty, G. F. di Lauro, J. C. Gilbertson, D. W. Stuteville
Nuclear Technology | Volume 26 | Number 4 | August 1975 | Pages 442-451
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24444
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A preliminary assessment of proof testing 13 prototypical liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) carbide fuel assemblies in fast test reactor (FTR) driver positions leads to the conclusion that the testing plan is practical and should produce a large amount of data at operating conditions very similar to those that would be found in large commercial carbide-fueled LMFBR s. Three subassembly configurations were designed, each capable of being directly substituted into FTR driver positions and made compatible with the FTR geometry, fuel handling, power, temperature, subassembly flow rates, and pin-bundle pressure drop. Two sodium-bonded designs, one with 91 fuel pins with a 0.370-in. o.d. and the other with 127 fuel pins with a 0.315-in. o.d. per subassembly were established. Calculated peak linear power and peak discharge burnup slightly exceed present commercial design objectives of 30 kW/ft and 73 MWd/kg. Individual assembly power history, flux, and enrichments are represented quite well in the FTR for commercial outer-zone fuel assemblies. Inner-zone operating conditions, however, are not simulated as closely. Impact effects of the proof-test assemblies on FTR operation are judged to be manageable.