ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
J. A. Vitti, P. K. Doherty, G. F. di Lauro, J. C. Gilbertson, D. W. Stuteville
Nuclear Technology | Volume 26 | Number 4 | August 1975 | Pages 442-451
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24444
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A preliminary assessment of proof testing 13 prototypical liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) carbide fuel assemblies in fast test reactor (FTR) driver positions leads to the conclusion that the testing plan is practical and should produce a large amount of data at operating conditions very similar to those that would be found in large commercial carbide-fueled LMFBR s. Three subassembly configurations were designed, each capable of being directly substituted into FTR driver positions and made compatible with the FTR geometry, fuel handling, power, temperature, subassembly flow rates, and pin-bundle pressure drop. Two sodium-bonded designs, one with 91 fuel pins with a 0.370-in. o.d. and the other with 127 fuel pins with a 0.315-in. o.d. per subassembly were established. Calculated peak linear power and peak discharge burnup slightly exceed present commercial design objectives of 30 kW/ft and 73 MWd/kg. Individual assembly power history, flux, and enrichments are represented quite well in the FTR for commercial outer-zone fuel assemblies. Inner-zone operating conditions, however, are not simulated as closely. Impact effects of the proof-test assemblies on FTR operation are judged to be manageable.