ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
ANS, UCOR sign MOU for workforce development program
The American Nuclear Society and United Cleanup Oak Ridge have signed a memorandum of understanding that establishes a framework for collaboration to advance ANS workforce training and certification programs serving the nuclear industry.
According to the document, UCOR will provide “operational insights and subject matter expertise to inform ANS’s professional development and credentialing offerings, including the Certified Nuclear Professional [CNP] program.” The collaboration will strengthen UCOR’s workforce development efforts while advancing ANS’s mission to sustain and expand the national nuclear workforce pipeline and capabilities.
W. Pfeiffer, J. R. Brown, A. C. Marshall
Nuclear Technology | Volume 27 | Number 3 | November 1975 | Pages 352-375
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24310
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Pulsed-neutron experiments were performed on the 330-MW Fort St. Vrain high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) to determine the reactivity of the core for various control rod configurations while the reactor was still subcritical. For all configurations the reactivity was inferred from the in-hour equation using the measured decay constant and a calculated generation time. For the configurations near critical, both the reactivity and generation time were determined using the extrapolated area-ratio method. The originally calculated (i.e., predicted) reactivities agreed poorly with those inferred from the experiments. However, by adding 5 ppm of boron to the reflector calculational model, the calculated generation time was significantly reduced. This brought the inferred reactivity into good agreement with that calculated for all control rod configurations. This emphasizes the dependence of the interpretation of pulsed-neutron experiments on calculations and the importance of the reflector in a large HTGR. Novel aspects of these experiments included the following: extensive two-dimensional computer simulations were performed prior to the experiments to determine the optimum source and detector locations; the neutron generation time was measured near critical by pulsing two different control rod configurations; all the data were fit by least squares to a sum of exponentials corresponding to one or two prompt modes and six delayed sub-modes; and an objective procedure using “tornado plots ” was developed to determine the starting channel for the least-squares analysis.