ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Roger L. Martz, Kevin M. Marshall
Nuclear Technology | Volume 184 | Number 2 | November 2013 | Pages 239-248
Technical Paper | Radiation Transport and Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-A22319
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
MCNP6 has been extended to include a new capability that permits tracking of neutrons and photons on an unstructured mesh (UM) embedded as a mesh universe within its constructive solid geometry capability. Our mesh geometry was created through Abaqus/CAE using its solid modeling capabilities. Monte Carlo transport results are calculated for mesh elements using a path length estimator while particles track from element face to element face on the mesh. This paper presents some performance comparisons for the initialization and calculation phases of two well-known benchmark problems using both the legacy and the UM tracking capabilities. For detailed geometries, UM initialization is always faster. For very detailed geometries where the models are comparable, the UM capability is faster than the legacy geometry capability.