ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
A. C. Hoyle, G. R. Howey
Nuclear Technology | Volume 1 | Number 1 | February 1965 | Pages 25-32
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT65-A20460
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two innovations in the design of the NPD primary system were to use carbon steel for piping and to fill and test with heavy water only. Resulting savings were $400 000 and $100 000, respectively. Specifications ensured satisfactory surface and fluid states following commissioning. Operation of the carbon steel system has been very satisfactory except for a fueling-machine failure when foreign materials were introduced into the system. The pD of the system has been maintained between 10 – 11, the dissolved O2 concentration at < 0.01 parts/106 and the crud level during steady-state operation at < 0.01 parts/106 with peak crud concentrations of < 0.1 parts/106. During pressure testing, 496 lbs of reactor grade D2O were lost at a cost of $12 400 at today's prices; nevertheless this loss is acceptably low. Significantly, the corrosion rate, the radiolytic damage, and the gas formation were never as great as had been expected. Carbon steel is therefore recommended for other pressurized water systems. The experience gained in operating NPD for two years showed the economic feasibility of pressurized D2O as a reactor coolant and pointed out the improvements required. Consequently, the target figure of 10 lb/day loss of D2O for a 200-MWe reactor now appears feasible.