ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Mirion announces appointments
Mirion Technologies has announced three senior leadership appointments designed to support its global nuclear and medical businesses while advancing a company-wide digital and AI strategy. The leadership changes come as Mirion seeks to advance innovation and maintain strong performance in nuclear energy, radiation safety, and medical applications.
Lung Kwang Pan, Cheng Si Tsao
Nuclear Technology | Volume 102 | Number 3 | June 1993 | Pages 313-322
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A17030
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A nondestructive measurement of spent fuel pins from the Taiwan Research Reactor has been performed at the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research. The analysis is based on a simplified balance equation for integrated flux and a series of one-group burnup-dependent microscopic cross-section libraries. A semiempirical test is used for evaluating the burnup values of two different kinds of spent fuel pins [natural uranium (0.7% 235U) and enriched uranium (7.0% 235U)] by the 134Cs/137Cs activity ratio. Results are compared with radiochemical burnup measurements. The agreement is within 3.8%, which verifies the accuracy of this method. The results are also compared with a theoretical estimation by the ORIGEN-II code. This indicates that the ORIGEN-II code’s library might have an overestimated σa (133Cs), which leads to a 134Cs/137Cs ratio that would result in a burnup value ∼24 to 35% lower than the measured data.