ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
DOE fast tracks test reactor projects: What to know
The Department of Energy today unveiled 10 companies racing to bring test reactors online by next year to meet Trump's deadline of next Independance Day, leveraging a new DOE pathway that allows reactor authorization outside national labs. As first outlined in one of the four executive orders on nuclear energy released by President Trump on May 23 and in the request for applications for the Reactor Pilot Program released June 18, the companies must use their own money and sites—and DOE authorization—to get reactors operating. What they won’t need is a Nuclear Regulatory Commission license.
Eugene W. Sucov, Chok Ken Liang
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 4 | April 1975 | Pages 714-721
Technical Paper | Reactor Siting | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A16127
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A rating method first identifies and evaluates the influence of various proponents in a, siting controversy and then combines these strength measures into an overall measure of the degree of acceptance of a proposed power plant by the community. The operating strength, OS, of an individual or group relevant to the controversy is defined to be the product of its relative significance, RS, or influence and its value judgment, VJ. That is, OSi = RSi × VJi, where i refers to the specific subject being analyzed. The function VJi can take on positive values (supporting the proposed plant) or negative values (opposing). The balance of forces supporting or opposing the plant is summarized by a single quantity, the total operating strength of the community, The above methodology was applied to a specific recent controversy. Citizen groups were found to be strongly opposed to the proposed plant, as expected, while the occupational groups strongly favored it. Influential individuals were, on balance, only slightly opposed to the project. The general public was strongly accepting of the plant and was decisive in causing the total operating strength of the community, OSTOT, be favorable to the power plant.