ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
Spent fuel transfer project completed at INL
Work crews at Idaho National Laboratory have transferred 40 spent nuclear fuel canisters into long-term storage vaults, the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management has reported.
Grant R. Jones, Ilze Jones, Brian A. Gray, Bud Parker, Jon C. Coe, John B. Burnham, Neil M. Geitner
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 4 | April 1975 | Pages 682-713
Technical Paper | Reactor Siting | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A16126
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The methodology for quantitative evaluation of visual impact considers the appearance and visual quality of a landscape setting as viewed from a series of representative viewpoints “before” and “after” the introduction of a nuclear facility. Procedures to select representative viewpoints are based an facility visibility from the surrounding area, viewing distance, observer position, and impacted viewing populations. A duplicate photo or slide taken from each representative viewpoint is touched up to portray the viewscape condition with the facility. The visual quality of each condition is then evaluated by applying the scaled measurements of intactness, vividness, unity, and importance of the major viewscape components, and these scores combined into a formula yielding a visual quality rating from 1 to 100. Total visual impact of a proposed facility is the sum of visual impacts measured at each representative viewpoint, with the difference between before and after conditions expressed in terms of percent of change modified by population viewing contact. An expression of the relative scarcity or uniqueness of the potentially impacted landscapes serves to protect remote areas and unique natural and cultural features.