ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Mirion announces appointments
Mirion Technologies has announced three senior leadership appointments designed to support its global nuclear and medical businesses while advancing a company-wide digital and AI strategy. The leadership changes come as Mirion seeks to advance innovation and maintain strong performance in nuclear energy, radiation safety, and medical applications.
Yasuhide Senda, Seiji Shiroya, Masatoshi Hayashi, Keiji Kanda
Nuclear Technology | Volume 70 | Number 3 | September 1985 | Pages 318-334
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A15959
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The results of analyses on the void reactivity measurements performed in the Kyoto University Critical Assembly using medium-enriched uranium fuel as well as highly enriched uranium fuel are provided. In consideration of the heterogeneity of a complex core, four-group constants were generated by SRAC, a standard thermal reactor code system for reactor design and analysis at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute. The eigenvalue and perturbation calculations were subsequently performed by the 2D-FEM-KUR code, which is a two-dimensional diffusion code based on the finite element method. The calculated eigenvalue keff agreed with the measured value to within 0.5% in the calculated-to-experiment ratio. The void reactivity calculated by perturbation theory approximately reproduced the experimental data including the spatial dependence. The discrepancy between the calculated and measured void reactivity was <0.05 × 10−3 Δ k / k per voided flow channel.