ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
C. Z. Serpan, Jr.
Nuclear Technology | Volume 12 | Number 1 | September 1971 | Pages 108-118
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A15903
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A simulated vessel wall environment was constructed that provided for measurements of steel embrittlement increase and neutron flux detector activation at two typical surveillance program locations, as well as at five additional locations, through the thickness of an 8-in.-thick steel “vessel wall.” Neutron spectra for these locations were calculated using one transport and two diffusion theory reactor physics spectrum codes plus a multiple-foil spectrum analysis code. The measured increases in steel transition temperature from the experimental locations revealed the expected gradient of highest embrittlement near the core to least embrittlement at the outer edge of the simulated vessel. Good agreement with published trends was observed. Comparisons of the code calculations versus measurements of the decrease in fluence level between locations, however, were favorable only over the shortest distances. Neutron fluences for the critically important region between fuel core and pressure vessel inner edge were significantly higher from a multiple-foil spectrum analysis code than from transport and diffusion codes when based on comparisons of spectrally adjusted iron activation measurements. This evidence of the possibility that the real fluence values in the pressure vessel wall environment are higher than those produced by common measurement techniques suggests the need for reevaluation of current surveillance data, improvements in reactor physics codes, and continuing assessments of measured versus calculated surveillance fluence data.