ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
2021 Student Conference
April 8–10, 2021
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Fusion Science and Technology
Don't forget to vote!
The 2021 ANS Election is open. This is your chance to help shape the future of your Society.
All ANS members were sent an email on February 22 with a unique username and password from Survey & Ballot Systems (SBS). If you did not receive this email or you do not have your election login information, please go to directvote.net/ANS, enter your email address that is on file with ANS, and your election login information will be emailed to you.
Alan H. Wells, Albert J. Machiels
Nuclear Technology | Volume 179 | Number 2 | August 2012 | Pages 180-188
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT12-A14090
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Spent nuclear fuel transported in large casks must remain subcritical in all credible configurations for normal operation and hypothetical accident conditions. The effects on spent nuclear fuel reactivity from "worst-case" accident scenarios were surveyed in NUREG/CR-6835, "Effects of Fuel Failure on Criticality Safety and Radiation Dose for Spent Fuel Casks." The survey used scenarios that were postulated to provide theoretical upper limits for reactivity effects of fuel relocation, although they were described as going "beyond credible conditions." These scenarios involved physical changes either to fuel assembly rod arrays or to collections of fuel pellets with the fuel skeleton removed. To provide more credible estimates of the probability and maximum reactivity changes, a process is presented that deconstructs each scenario into a set of subscenarios and identifies the physical phenomena required to create the subscenario. The boundary between credible but unlikely scenarios and incredible scenarios is more easily discernible with this process.For marginally credible worst-case scenarios, it is concluded that the maximum reasonable reactivity increase either is less than the mandated administrative nuclear criticality safety margin for scenarios involving physical changes to fuel assembly rod arrays or is a substantial reactivity decrease for scenarios involving collections of fuel pellets. A cask designer could apply scenario deconstruction to evaluate the physical limits that apply to a particular transportation cask, and perform calculations specific to a particular cask design to show that criticality safety requirements are met.