ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Glass strategy: Hanford’s enhanced waste glass program
The mission of the Department of Energy’s Office of River Protection (ORP) is to complete the safe cleanup of waste resulting from decades of nuclear weapons development. One of the most technologically challenging responsibilities is the safe disposition of approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste historically stored in 177 tanks at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
ORP has a clear incentive to reduce the overall mission duration and cost. One pathway is to develop and deploy innovative technical solutions that can advance baseline flow sheets toward higher efficiency operations while reducing identified risks without compromising safety. Vitrification is the baseline process that will convert both high-level and low-level radioactive waste at Hanford into a stable glass waste form for long-term storage and disposal.
Although vitrification is a mature technology, there are key areas where technology can further reduce operational risks, advance baseline processes to maximize waste throughput, and provide the underpinning to enhance operational flexibility; all steps in reducing mission duration and cost.
Alan H. Wells, Albert J. Machiels
Nuclear Technology | Volume 176 | Number 3 | December 2011 | Pages 387-394
Technical Paper | Radiation Transport and Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT11-A13315
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
According to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's guidance based on concerns for potential channeling of neutrons between absorber particles, the criticality safety of transportation systems should not rely on credit for >75% of the boron in fixed neutron absorbers. The 75% efficiency (or effectiveness) factor was first formulated in 1987 for a cask to transport spent fuel from the Fermi Unit 1 (Fermi-1) fast breeder reactor. Fermi-1 fuel was highly enriched (25.6 wt%), and a critical condition could possibly be achieved in a dry environment. The 75% factor was later expanded to include low-enriched light water reactor (LWR) spent fuel, although the latter cannot achieve a critical state without the presence of a moderator. Under flooded conditions, the net effect of channeling is significantly reduced because the neutrons are nearly isotropically scattered by the moderator and impact the neutron absorber from all possible directions. Under dry conditions or under conditions representative in neutron attenuation measurements for absorber qualification, the neutrons impact the absorber mostly perpendicularly, and neutron channeling is maximized. The effect of neutron channeling for the Fermi-1 fuel and for a typical LWR fuel shipment was quantified using a methodology developed to apply experimental transmission data to calculations of the neutron angular distribution at the neutron absorber sheet, yielding the strength of the neutron channeling effect for a particular fuel type and cask basket geometry. These analyses show that neutron absorber qualification via a collimated neutron transmission measurement conservatively bounds the neutron channeling effect. Further imposition of a 75%-only credit leads to an overly conservative amount in neutron absorbers. For transport applications of LWR spent fuel, this results in increased costs with no measurable benefits to criticality safety.