ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Pascal Lemaitre, Emmanuel Porcheron, Amandine Nuboer
Nuclear Technology | Volume 175 | Number 3 | September 2011 | Pages 553-571
Technical Paper | NURETH-13 Special / Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT11-A12506
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
During the course of a hypothetical severe accident in a nuclear power plant, spray may be activated in order to reduce static pressure in the containment. The Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN) has developed the TOSQAN experiment to provide a better understanding of the heat transfer and mass transfer that take place between a spray and the surrounding confined gas in such a situation. This paper studies how the temperature of the spray at the injection point influences the dynamics of a test. To carry out this analysis, we performed two spray tests: spray test 101 (ST101), which served as a reference, and spray test 107 (ST107), which had exactly the same initial and boundary conditions except for the temperature of the spray at the injection point, which varied from 25°C to 58°C. First, we present the entire scenario for ST101 and ST107 and the results of the tests. We then focus our analysis on the intercomparison of the thermal-hydraulic behavior induced by the spray temperature at the injection point and the wall temperature. This intercomparison is divided into two parts: global and local.