ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Christopher S. Melhus
Nuclear Technology | Volume 175 | Number 1 | July 2011 | Pages 32-39
Technical Paper | Special Issue on the 16th Biennial Topical Meeting of the Radiation Protection and Shielding Division / Radiation Biology; Radiation Used in Medicine | doi.org/10.13182/NT11-A12266
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Eye plaque brachytherapy is a sight-preserving medical procedure in which radioactive sources are reproducibly arranged within a collimating source backing and temporarily sutured to the eye. The procedure was established as an alternative to enucleation or eye removal for the treatment ocular melanoma. The 1987 Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) standardized this treatment technique in a prospective, randomized clinical trial; however, dose calculations were performed using simple assumptions. These assumptions used the point-source dosimetry formalism, omitted dose anisotropy, and ignored the presence of dose perturbing material heterogeneities. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations from the mid-1980s to the present have critically evaluated these assumptions and indicated where improvements in practice could be made. Various investigators have used MC to evaluate plaque design, choice of source radionuclide, X-ray fluorescence from plaque components, plaque material heterogeneity attenuation, and patient tissue heterogeneity attenuation, among others. These publications are reviewed with emphasis on clinically relevant observations. In addition, MC simulations of standard COMS eye plaques using MCNP5 are made and compared to published data using other MC codes. Good agreement is observed between radiation transport codes with differences <2%, for points within the eye globe. These results indicate that historically delivered radiation doses were systematically lower than prescribed doses. Practical considerations for implementing MC calculations in the clinic are introduced, and the need for a heterogeneity-corrected treatment planning system to ensure treatment uniformity across medical centers and for different treatment techniques is discussed.