ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
2021 Student Conference
April 8–10, 2021
Virtual Meeting
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2021
Jul 2020
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2021
Nuclear Technology
February 2021
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2021
Latest News
NC State celebrates 70 years of nuclear engineering education
An early picture of the research reactor building on the North Carolina State University campus. The Department of Nuclear Engineering is celebrating the 70th anniversary of its nuclear engineering curriculum in 2020–2021. Photo: North Carolina State University
The Department of Nuclear Engineering at North Carolina State University has spent the 2020–2021 academic year celebrating the 70th anniversary of its becoming the first U.S. university to establish a nuclear engineering curriculum. It started in 1950, when Clifford Beck, then of Oak Ridge, Tenn., obtained support from NC State’s dean of engineering, Harold Lampe, to build the nation’s first university nuclear reactor and, in conjunction, establish an educational curriculum dedicated to nuclear engineering.
The department, host to the 2021 ANS Virtual Student Conference, scheduled for April 8–10, now features 23 tenure/tenure-track faculty and three research faculty members. “What a journey for the first nuclear engineering curriculum in the nation,” said Kostadin Ivanov, professor and department head.
Akifumi Yamaji, Katsuyuki Kawashima, Shigeo Ohki, Tomoyasu Mizuno, Tsutomu Okubo
Nuclear Technology | Volume 171 | Number 2 | August 2010 | Pages 142-152
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT10-A10779
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The idea of recycling minor actinides (MAs) with fast breeder reactors (FBRs) is an effective way to potentially reduce environmental burdens associated with nuclear energy production. For such FBR cores, it is necessary to find one or more promising MA loading methods that can effectively transmute MAs while minimizing deterioration of the core performance and reducing the overall fuel fabrication cost. In this study, the homogeneous MA loading core with 3 wt% MAs is used as a reference design to evaluate the impact of the americium (Am) target in-core loading on reactivity characteristics and unprotected loss-of-flow (ULOF) response of sodium-cooled mixed-oxide FBR.The Am target loading core of this study is designed by roughly preserving the MA inventory of the homogeneous MA loading core while placing Am and curium (Cm) to the ring-shaped target region between the inner and the outer core regions with 20 wt% content.This design can flatten core radial reactivity worth distributions and effectively reduce reactivity insertion into the core during ULOF compared with the homogeneous MA loading core. It also has relatively flat and stable radial power distributions, which allow a relatively large coolant flow rate to be distributed to the target region.During ULOF, the power increase of the Am target loading core of this study is slower than that of the homogeneous MA loading core. The maximum fuel temperature of the target region does not become particularly high compared with that of the inner core, and it is much lower than the melting point. Hence, the proposed Am target in-core loading method does not have a significant influence on ULOF response of the core. It is promising from the viewpoints of the reactivity characteristics and ULOF response.