ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
DOE signs two more OTAs in Reactor Pilot Program
This week, the Department of Energy has finalized two new other transaction agreements (OTAs) with participating companies in its Reactor Pilot Program, which aims to get one or two fast-tracked reactors on line by July 4 of this year. Those companies are Terrestrial Energy and Oklo.
T. V. Dury, M. T. Dhotre
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 165 | Number 1 | May 2010 | Pages 101-116
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE08-90
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Current designs of pressurized water reactors (PWRs) employ a boric acid solution in the primary cooling water to control core reactivity during operation and shutdown. However, situations could theoretically occur in which diluted borated water is present in the primary circuit. Scale experiments have been performed for a single-pump start-up, with subsequent computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, to examine the accuracy with which the concentration distribution of diluted borated water entering a reactor core can be predicted. It was concluded that higher-order advection schemes must be used to obtain sufficient resolution of the velocity field and capture the larger-scale effects of the flow but that each turbulence model produces a different core-inlet boron concentration development and distribution. Though it was not the most sophisticated available, the two-equation RNG k- turbulence model produced the closest agreement with experiment. However, mesh independence of the computational results was not achieved. As a sequel to this scaled CFD study, a simulation was carried out of a full-size three-loop Siemens-type PWR featuring a perforated cylindrical flow baffle in the lower plenum. Results again showed different characteristics in time and space, depending on the turbulence model used. Comparative assessment of the results obtained with the code CFX-5 showed that correct geometrical modeling of a perforated flow baffle in the lower plenum is essential, as a porous medium representation of the baffle can lead to serious underprediction of mixing. This occurred particularly with the RNG model but also using more sophisticated turbulence models. Further refinement of the mesh is now necessary to achieve mesh independence of the results. This requires access to a massively parallel computer system.