ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Hyung Jin Shim, Chang Hyo Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 162 | Number 1 | May 2009 | Pages 98-108
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-2
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The sample variance of a tally in Monte Carlo eigenvalue calculations is biased because of an intercycle correlation between the fission source distributions (FSDs). How to estimate the variance bias or equivalently how to calculate the real variance has been an interesting subject of study. This paper proposes a new method to estimate the real variance based on an intercycle covariance of the FSDs that can be derived from the cycle-by-cycle stochastic error propagation model. The proposed method enables one to calculate every intercycle covariance of a tally accurately, regardless of the number of active cycles. Therefore, the method can be applied satisfactorily even to problems with the dominance ratio (DR) close to 1. The accuracy of the new method is examined for small- and medium-sized pressurized water reactor core problems and a fuel storage facility problem exhibiting a slow source convergence. It is shown that the new method is capable of predicting the variance bias strikingly better than the existing methods, especially for problems with high DRs.