ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Thermal Hydraulics
The division provides a forum for focused technical dialogue on thermal hydraulic technology in the nuclear industry. Specifically, this will include heat transfer and fluid mechanics involved in the utilization of nuclear energy. It is intended to attract the highest quality of theoretical and experimental work to ANS, including research on basic phenomena and application to nuclear system design.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
AI and productivity growth
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
This month’s issue of Nuclear News focuses on supply and demand. The “supply” part of the story highlights nuclear’s continued success in providing electricity to the grid more than 90 percent of the time, while the “demand” part explores the seemingly insatiable appetite of hyperscale data centers for steady, carbon-free energy.
Technically, we are in the second year of our AI epiphany, the collective realization that Big Tech’s energy demands are so large that they cannot be met without a historic build-out of new generation capacity. Yet the enormity of it all still seems hard to grasp.
or the better part of two decades, U.S. electricity demand has been flat. Sure, we’ve seen annual fluctuations that correlate with weather patterns and the overall domestic economic performance, but the gigawatt-hours of electricity America consumed in 2021 are almost identical to our 2007 numbers.
Luca Fiorito, Matteo Zanetti, Federico Grimaldi, Gert van den Eynde
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 1 | April 2025 | Pages S56-S72
Review Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2353987
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Safety analyses of MYRRHA require calculating the reactor temperature feedback coefficients of reactivity associated with power operation. Within this framework, a significant emphasis is put on the quantification of the reactivity coefficient uncertainty, which takes into account different uncertainty sources. This work reports the investigation of the fuel Doppler coefficient of reactivity of MYRRHA implemented with the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo particle transport code. Nuclear data and the MYRRHA mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel composition are selected as major sources of uncertainties, and their impact on the Doppler coefficient is assessed with a stochastic sampling approach. Nuclear data covariance matrices are taken from the JEFF-3.3 evaluated library and propagated with the SANDY code.
Uncertainties of the fuel composition are derived from declared records for MOX fuel assemblies irradiated in a pressurized water reactor/boiling water reactor. The contribution of the aleatoric Monte Carlo uncertainty could be removed from the stochastic uncertainty estimate of the Doppler coefficient by using a methodology based on conditional estimators. This technique has proved to be tremendously advantageous to quantify the uncertainty of reactivity feedback coefficients using Monte Carlo codes, overcoming some of the limitations associated with sensitivity-based uncertainty propagation methods. The uncertainties of the MYRRHA Doppler constant KD, considering the variability of nuclear data (only cross sections) and MOX fuel compositions, are, respectively, 3.0% and 1.3%, with a negligible dependence on the considered fuel temperature. The largest nuclear data uncertainty contributions comes from 238U and 239,240Pu, while the impact of the Pb and Bi uncertainties is only marginal.