ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Ho Nieh nominated to the NRC
Nieh
President Trump recently nominated Ho Nieh for the role of commissioner in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission through the remainder of a term that will expire June 30, 2029.
Nieh has been the vice president of regulatory affairs at Southern Nuclear since 2021, though he is currently working as a loaned executive at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, where he has been for more than a year.
Nieh’s experience: Nieh started his career at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, where he worked primarily as a nuclear plant engineer and contributed as a civilian instructor in the U.S. Navy’s Nuclear Power Program.
From there, he joined the NRC in 1997 as a project engineer. In more than 19 years of service at the organization, he served in a variety of key leadership roles, including division director of Reactor Projects, division director of Inspection and Regional Support, and director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Fred D. Lang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 6 | June 2025 | Pages 1010-1028
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2406724
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This work proposes a paradigm shift in nuclear safety. Its NCV Method (neutronics/calorimetrics/verification procedures) integrates nuclear power’s motive force—neutron flux—within Second Law exergy analysis, coupled with corrected conservation of energy flows, both descriptive of the entire system. These descriptions with two satellite equations result in a verifiable understanding of the nuclear engine: neutron flux [or neutronic terms f (Φ)], useful power produced, and system heat rejection, all coupled to reactor vessel coolant mass flow. Key to NCV is its assumption that all nuclear phenomena are inertial processes, devoid of terrestrial reference. This approach demands reinterpretation of Einstein’s ΔE = c2Δm by describing his ΔE as an exergetic potential, an ultimate Free Exergy. For fission, Free Exergy consists of both recoverable and irreversible portions given a total MeV release. In transference to the coolant, the recoverable release produces an exergetic increase (Δg) in the fluid; an explicitly calculated Inertial Conversion Factor produces a computed Core Thermal Power (Δh) and a nuclear TRef.
This paper asserts that traditional nuclear engineering has lacked direct linkage between neutron flux and system fluid thermodynamics. With NCV, nuclear power’s motive force is explicitly related to extensive properties, thus allowing reconciliation of principal system parameters of the nuclear engine (fission source, power out, heat rejection, and main system flow). Principal verification is accomplished by comparing the computed useful power to that which is directly measured. The NCV method has the potential to reduce uncertainty in computed Core Thermal Power from its commonly accepted ±2% by an order of magnitude. Its ability to improve plant safety becomes intrinsic, for example: ● tracking changes in verifiable flux versus reactor vessel coolant flow; ● tracking changes in the axial position where saturation may be approached, and the position of the average coolant temperature; ● monitoring the instantaneously computed flux versus reactor vessel pump currents; ● detecting changes in the important ΔλGEN and ΔλEQ40 verification parameters, which compare the computed shaft power delivered to the generator, to the measured; ● surveilling component irreversible losses using Fission Consumption Indices; etc.
● tracking changes in verifiable flux versus reactor vessel coolant flow;
● tracking changes in the axial position where saturation may be approached, and the position of the average coolant temperature;
● monitoring the instantaneously computed flux versus reactor vessel pump currents;
● detecting changes in the important ΔλGEN and ΔλEQ40 verification parameters, which compare the computed shaft power delivered to the generator, to the measured;
● surveilling component irreversible losses using Fission Consumption Indices; etc.