ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Ho Nieh nominated to the NRC
Nieh
President Trump recently nominated Ho Nieh for the role of commissioner in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission through the remainder of a term that will expire June 30, 2029.
Nieh has been the vice president of regulatory affairs at Southern Nuclear since 2021, though he is currently working as a loaned executive at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, where he has been for more than a year.
Nieh’s experience: Nieh started his career at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, where he worked primarily as a nuclear plant engineer and contributed as a civilian instructor in the U.S. Navy’s Nuclear Power Program.
From there, he joined the NRC in 1997 as a project engineer. In more than 19 years of service at the organization, he served in a variety of key leadership roles, including division director of Reactor Projects, division director of Inspection and Regional Support, and director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Dakota Santana, D. Keith Hollingsworth
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 4 | April 2025 | Pages 653-678
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2380633
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This work provides an overview of vaporization phenomena in liquid-core nuclear thermal rockets to aid in unifying modeling assumptions by characterizing the impact of vaporization. Historical variations in vapor modeling have led to reported specific impulses ranging from 1000 to 2000s following model refinements in the 1960s and the omission of vaporization consideration post 1990. The only preexisting vapor transport study to not rely on the Reynold’s analogy was performed for the radiator design.
This paper performs the first such analysis for the bubbler design, given its renewed interest. Consideration is given to potential centrifugal species separation, proposed fuel mixtures, interplay between chamber pressure and vaporization, impacts on propellant thermoproperties, evaporative cooling, power requirements for vapor separation, and the complexity of hydrocarbon interactions under the proposed chamber conditions.
The bubbler design is shown to be well approximated as fully saturated, whereas the radiator and droplet designs may be configured to reduce vaporization to 20% saturation. Characterization of vaporization within liquid cores is essential to early design decisions, such as overall archetype, defining the operating point, and liquid media composition. For a threshold temperature corresponding to around 10% of the propellant being vapor by mass, further increases in temperature begin reducing the specific impulse. Below this threshold temperature, the impact of vaporization on thermal modeling with the chamber is likely negligible. Above this threshold temperature, higher-fidelity thermal modeling will be required, and the work required to separate the vapor begins exceeding 100 kW/(kgH/s).
Nozzle kinetics are applied to liquid cores for the first time, showing that specific impulses increase with increasing chamber pressure contrary to historical findings. Historically, modeled uranium-zirconium-carbon mixtures are predicted to reach a specific impulse up to 1260 s. A uranium-tungsten-carbon fuel mixture yielded the best theoretical specific impulse of slightly under 1400 s; however, no nucleonic or thermal analysis has been conducted with this fuel composition.
