This study compares the accuracy, efficiency, and reliability of variance reduction (VR) methods for Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations involving wide-area ground plane (i.e., “surface”) and buried (i.e., “volumetric”) gamma source emissions from environmental soil. The simulation models are idealized external exposure scenarios intended as a basis for deriving site-specific dose-based or carcinogenic risk–based regulatory limits in the radiological site remediation process. These simulations are computationally resource intensive since particle tracks are transported from an extremely large source region to a relatively small detector region. For each simulation, several VR methods are compared with metrics of accuracy, efficiency, and reliability. The MCNP deterministic transport (DXTRAN) VR method was most effective for problems involving sources emitting low-energy gamma rays, and a coupled multicode method was more effective for problems involving sources emitting higher-energy gamma rays that undergo significant attenuation in the soil.