ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Shifting the paradigm of supply chain
Chad Wolf
When I began my nuclear career, I was coached up in the nuclear energy culture of the day to “run silent, run deep,” a mindset rooted in the U.S. Navy’s submarine philosophy. That was the norm—until Fukushima.
The nuclear renaissance that many had envisioned hit a wall. The focus shifted from expansion to survival. Many utility communications efforts pivoted from silence to broadcast, showcasing nuclear energy’s elegance and reliability. Nevertheless, despite being clean baseload 24/7 power that delivered a 90 percent capacity factor or higher, nuclear energy was painted as risky and expensive (alongside energy policies and incentives that favored renewables).
Economics became a driving force threatening to shutter nuclear power. The Delivering the Nuclear Promise initiative launched in 2015 challenged the industry to sustain high performance yet cut costs by up to 30 percent.
Rex Gyeabour Abrefah, Felix Ameyaw
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 10 | October 2024 | Pages 2038-2050
Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2284454
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effectiveness of contemporary strategies for conducting fault tree/event tree (FTET) analyses within the realm of probabilistic risk assessment has recently come under rigorous examination. In light of such investigation, facility managers have gained a more profound understanding of the risk and safety implications inherent in the structural and componential integrity of systems (structures, systems, and components). This comprehensive research endeavor harnesses the power of risk models, employing both FTET and binary decision diagrams, to scrutinize and optimize the operational performance of a 10-MW reference Russian research reactor [Water-Water Research Reactor (VVR)] within the framework of probabilistic safety assessment. Moreover, this investigation delves into the intricate web of interrelationships existing among an array of analytical methodologies. These encompass the Fussell-Vesely (FV) importance measure, criticality analysis, Birnbaum analysis, risk achievement worth (RAW), and the differential importance measure, all with a focus on specific foundational events and vital components. Additionally, this note delves into the analysis of multiple significant measures frequently employed for VVR. Notably, the study establishes that merely two importance measures (IMs) prove sufficient for the core damage equation. Furthermore, this note investigates various important measures often employed for VVR. It is shown that two IMs are enough for the core damage equation. In conclusion, RAW, FV importance, or a blend of the two are adequate enough to be frequently employed for the VVR.
