ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Xinyu Zhou, Kun Liu, Haitao Ju, Chen Zhao, Hongbo Zhang, Bo Wang, Wenbo Zhao, Zhang Chen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 9 | September 2024 | Pages 1879-1899
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2280344
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The linear axial expansion transport method avoids the negative source problem caused by transverse leakage in the traditional two-dimensional/one-dimensional (2D/1D) transport method and has better stability. However, stability is poor with the coarse-mesh finite difference (CMFD) accelerated linear axial expansion transport method. In this paper, the stability of the partial current–based coarse-mesh finite difference (p-CMFD) method, the optimally diffusive coarse-mesh finite difference (od-CMFD) method, and the linear prolongation coarse-mesh finite difference (lp-CMFD) method is studied based on Fourier analysis. The results of the Fourier analysis indicate that the problem is stable for axial coarse-mesh optical thickness less than 2 or larger than 50; the calculation diverges when the axial coarse-mesh optical thickness is between 2 and 50. The numerical results of the KUCA benchmark problem are the same as the results of the Fourier analysis.