ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Proposed FY 2027 DOE, NRC budgets ask for less
The White House is requesting $1.5 billion for the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy in the fiscal year 2027 budget proposal, about 9 percent less than the previous year.
The request from the Trump administration is one of several associated with nuclear energy in the proposal, which was released Friday. Congress still must review and vote on the budget.
Xinyu Zhou, Kun Liu, Haitao Ju, Chen Zhao, Hongbo Zhang, Bo Wang, Wenbo Zhao, Zhang Chen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 9 | September 2024 | Pages 1879-1899
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2280344
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The linear axial expansion transport method avoids the negative source problem caused by transverse leakage in the traditional two-dimensional/one-dimensional (2D/1D) transport method and has better stability. However, stability is poor with the coarse-mesh finite difference (CMFD) accelerated linear axial expansion transport method. In this paper, the stability of the partial current–based coarse-mesh finite difference (p-CMFD) method, the optimally diffusive coarse-mesh finite difference (od-CMFD) method, and the linear prolongation coarse-mesh finite difference (lp-CMFD) method is studied based on Fourier analysis. The results of the Fourier analysis indicate that the problem is stable for axial coarse-mesh optical thickness less than 2 or larger than 50; the calculation diverges when the axial coarse-mesh optical thickness is between 2 and 50. The numerical results of the KUCA benchmark problem are the same as the results of the Fourier analysis.