ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Hanford contractor settles fraud suit for $3.45M
Hanford Site services contractor Hanford Mission Integration Solutions (HMIS) has agreed to pay the Department of Justice $3.45 million as part of a settlement agreement resolving allegations that HMIS overcharged the Department of Energy for millions of dollars in labor hours at the nuclear site in Washington state.
Naoto Aizawa, Cheol Ho Pyeon
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 3 | March 2024 | Pages 658-672
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2212580
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron irradiation experiments are carried out in source-driven subcritical cores with high-energy neutrons generated by spallation reactions between a 100-MeV proton beam and a lead-bismuth target at the Kyoto University Critical Assembly. The main objective of the experiments is to investigate the effect of epithermal and resonance neutrons on the accuracy of capture reaction rates with respect to a subcriticality variation. Activation foils of copper, indium, tantalum, and tungsten are employed to obtain capture reaction rates for epithermal and resonance neutrons by applying the cadmium difference method. Also, the applicability of the foils for the measurement of the reaction rates for epithermal and resonance neutrons is substantiated in the critical irradiation experiments performed prior to the subcritical experiments. The subcritical experiments are conducted with three different subcriticalities by changing the control rod insertion pattern.
The measured reaction rates are compared with the calculated values obtained by the Monte Carlo code MVP with JENDL-4.0, and the ratio of the calculation and experiment values of the reaction rates shows equivalent values within the 1σ errors regardless of a difference in the subcriticality. The compared results indicate that the numerical analyses have a consistent accuracy of reaction rates in epithermal and resonance energy regions for a subcriticality variation in source-driven subcritical cores.