ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
G. P. Nyalunga, V. V. Naicker
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 3 | March 2024 | Pages 640-657
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2205198
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA) benchmark has been established over recent years to satisfy an increasing demand from the nuclear community for best-estimate predictions accompanied by uncertainty and sensitivity analyses. The main objectives of the OECD/NEA benchmark activity are to determine uncertainties in modeling for reactor systems using best-estimate methods under steady-state and transient conditions and to quantify the impact of these uncertainties for each type of calculation in multiphysics analyses. In terms of light water reactor analyses, an international uncertainty analysis, “Benchmarks for Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (UAM) for the Design, Operation and Safety Analysis of LWRs” is currently in progress, being coordinated by the OECD/NEA. In the neutronic phases of the benchmark, the uncertainty due to nuclear data is being studied for various LWR types.
The LCT086 benchmark, which is a VVER-type reactor criticality benchmark experiment, has been identified to form part of the validation matrix for the uncertainty methodology development. Resulting from this, the main focus of the present work is to propagate the uncertainty due to the nuclear data for two cases (LCT086/Case1 and LCT086/Case3) presented in the LCT086 benchmark. Both fuel assembly and core models were used for the analysis. The code package used to perform the calculations was SCALE 6.2.1. In particular, the function modules KENO-VI, SAMPLER, and TSUNAMI-3D of SCALE 6.2.1 were used. MCNP 6.1 was also used for continuous-energy criticality calculations.
In addition to propagating the uncertainty due to the nuclear data, the uncertainty due to selected input parameters as bounded by the manufacturing tolerances were also propagated so that the modeling methods employed could be verified against those reported in the LCT086 benchmark. The results obtained for the nuclear data uncertainty were further compared with nuclear data uncertainty propagation results for the OECD/NEA UAM Kozloduy-6 reactor system. The uncertainty in the multiplication factor is reported in pcm together with the main contributors to the uncertainty from the nuclear data reported in .