ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Spent fuel recycling and conditioning topic of U.S.-Japan meeting
Officials with the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management discussed spent nuclear fuel recycling and conditioning with counterparts from Japan during the 13th U.S.-Japan Technical Meeting of the Civil Nuclear Energy Research and Development Working Group, held recently in Santa Fe, N.M.
Awais Zahur, Muhammad Rizwan Ali, Deokjung Lee
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 12 | December 2023 | Pages 3175-3192
Technical Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2189888
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A coupling framework named Multi-Physics CORE (MPCORE) is developed to analyze the multiphysics phenomenon in a nuclear reactor. MPCORE performs two-way coupling between two physics modules. A rod ejection accident (REA) is an important design-basis accident that results in an instantaneous power surge in the case of prompt criticality. Hence, this technical note studies the passive response of a nuclear reactor core in the case of a similar rapid reactivity insertion. Stand-alone calculations by neutronics, thermal-hydraulic (TH), or fuel performance (FP) modules use conservative options for other physics modules. Thus, multiphysics analysis provides a more realistic assessment of actual prospective damage. MPCORE employs an adaptive time-step feature to reduce execution time. Moreover, it performs in-memory transfer of data between different modules. This technical note evaluates the performance of the TH module with cross flow (subchannel) and without cross flow (one-dimensional). For the FP module, the effect of dynamic and static gap heat transfer coefficient models is also quantified. Hence, four combinations with these two TH and FP options are simulated. The following are the safety parameters compared for different models: departure from nucleate boiling ratio, linear power, fuel enthalpy, fuel centerline temperature, cladding outer surface temperature, and coolant temperature.