ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
Mathieu N. Dupont, Matthew D. Eklund, Peter F. Caracappa, Wei Ji
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 11 | November 2023 | Pages 2884-2901
Regular Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2172307
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
As part of efforts to develop coupled multiphysics experiments for the benchmark of modern multiphysics reactor simulators, a low-power and open-pool type of light water reactor at the Walthousen Reactor Critical Facility (RCF) was reconfigured with additional equipment, and its neutronic characteristics were fully surveyed. A water loop system was designed and installed to pass through the central region of the reactor core, making the central region overmoderated. The overmoderation would lead to a positive temperature reactivity feedback in the modified reactor configuration. This phenomenon is observed when the system temperature is between 10.69°C and 28.70°C. The inversion point of the isothermal reactivity coefficient is at 28.70°C ± 1.07°C. At this temperature, competition between the negative and positive thermal effects on reactivity compensate each other, and the isothermal reactivity coefficient becomes negative at temperatures higher than the inversion point. This paper presents the experimental determination of the isothermal reactivity and reactivity coefficient at different temperatures as well as the inversion point in the modified RCF reactor configuration. To obtain the best-quality results possible, special attention is given to the choice and adaptation of all the available methods for data postprocessing of experiment measurements. Neutron flux denoising is performed with multivariate wavelet transforms and principal component analysis. The Inverse Kinetics Method is applied to derive reactivity from the neutron flux measurements. To provide accurate and high-fidelity experiment benchmark data for modern code validation, in-depth experimental uncertainty quantification is developed. The results of the experiments show the mixed effects of system temperature on reactor reactivity due to the combined effects of Doppler broadening in the fuel, S(α,β) thermal scattering physics, and change in water density and can be used to validate previously developed cross-section interpolation models in the low-temperature range and positive isothermal reactivity coefficient conditions.