ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
High-temperature plumbing and advanced reactors
The use of nuclear fission power and its role in impacting climate change is hotly debated. Fission advocates argue that short-term solutions would involve the rapid deployment of Gen III+ nuclear reactors, like Vogtle-3 and -4, while long-term climate change impact would rely on the creation and implementation of Gen IV reactors, “inherently safe” reactors that use passive laws of physics and chemistry rather than active controls such as valves and pumps to operate safely. While Gen IV reactors vary in many ways, one thing unites nearly all of them: the use of exotic, high-temperature coolants. These fluids, like molten salts and liquid metals, can enable reactor engineers to design much safer nuclear reactors—ultimately because the boiling point of each fluid is extremely high. Fluids that remain liquid over large temperature ranges can provide good heat transfer through many demanding conditions, all with minimal pressurization. Although the most apparent use for these fluids is advanced fission power, they have the potential to be applied to other power generation sources such as fusion, thermal storage, solar, or high-temperature process heat.1–3
John Stamatakos, Biswajit Dasgupta, Osvaldo Pensado, Nilesh Chokshi, Robert Budnitz, M. K. Ravindra
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 11 | November 2023 | Pages 2743-2750
PSA 2021 Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2158701
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The commercial nuclear power plant industry initiated the licensing modernization project (LMP) to enhance the risk-informed and performance-based (RIPB) regulatory basis for advanced nuclear power reactors. The LMP framework relies heavily on RIPB concepts and approaches that together integrate the defense-in-depth philosophy. One example approach for seismic design is to align the LMP concepts with the performance targets described in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) standard, ASCE 43-19. The underlying strategy of this approach is to consider the performance of individual structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in seismic design, as well as the role they play in an accident event sequence. This approach contrasts with current regulations, in which every individual safety-related SSC is designed to the same seismic criteria irrespective of the role the SSC plays in the overall system performance. This new philosophy envisions more flexible seismic design options for each SSC, such that the overall seismic design can meet system-level acceptability criteria as well as plant-level acceptability criteria. The objective of this paper is to illustrate the flexibility and benefits of this proposed approach to the seismic design of SSCs in terms of reduced SSC demands (by reducing the design ground motions for SSCs) and improved SSC capacities (by allowing for alternative damage state limits). A simple shear wall was designed using ASCE 43-19 for a hard rock site in the Central Eastern United States considering alternate seismic design category and limit state combinations to examine the physical designs and functional fragilities of these combinations and their impact on seismic performance. The flexibility of this proposed approach is illustrated by an example that shows reduced SSC demands, while the SSC capacities and margins remain consistent with the required safety performance without any loss in overall plant safety.