ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep geologic repository progress—2025 Update
Editor's note: This article has was originally published in November 2023. It has been updated with new information as of June 2025.
Outside my office, there is a display case filled with rock samples from all over the world. It contains a disk of translucent, orange salt from the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, N.M.; a core of white-and-bronze gneiss from the site of the future deep geologic repository in Eurajoki, Finland; several angular chunks of fine-grained, gray claystone from the underground research laboratory at Bure, France; and a piece of coarse-grained granite from the underground research tunnel in Daejeon, South Korea.
Satoshi Takeda, Takanori Kitada
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 8 | August 2023 | Pages 1621-1633
Technical papers from: PHYSOR 2022 | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2123679
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Assuming that the discrepancy between the experimental value and the calculation value comes from the cross section, experimental error, and calculation error, Bayesian estimation of the cross section and these errors were studied. Uncertainty of the discrepancy between the experimental value and the design value is discussed by comparing the present estimation and the bias factor method. Comparison of the formulas shows that the design value obtained by the bias factor method is consistent with that obtained by estimation of the cross section and calculation error of the target system. In addition, the uncertainty of the discrepancy between the experimental value and the design value can be reduced by considering a correlation of the experimental error between the mock-up experiment and the target system. A case study was performed using mixed oxide critical assembly benchmarks. The result shows that the experimental value of the target system can be accurately predicted by considering the cross section, experimental error, and calculation error.