ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Education and training to support Canadian nuclear workforce development
Along with several other nations, Canada has committed to net-zero emissions by 2050. Part of this plan is tripling nuclear generating capacity. As of 2025, the country has four operating nuclear generating stations with a total of 17 reactors, 16 of which are in the province of Ontario. The Independent Electricity System Operator has recommended that an additional 17,800 MWe of nuclear power be added to Ontario’s grid.
Satoshi Takeda, Takanori Kitada
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 8 | August 2023 | Pages 1621-1633
Technical papers from: PHYSOR 2022 | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2123679
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Assuming that the discrepancy between the experimental value and the calculation value comes from the cross section, experimental error, and calculation error, Bayesian estimation of the cross section and these errors were studied. Uncertainty of the discrepancy between the experimental value and the design value is discussed by comparing the present estimation and the bias factor method. Comparison of the formulas shows that the design value obtained by the bias factor method is consistent with that obtained by estimation of the cross section and calculation error of the target system. In addition, the uncertainty of the discrepancy between the experimental value and the design value can be reduced by considering a correlation of the experimental error between the mock-up experiment and the target system. A case study was performed using mixed oxide critical assembly benchmarks. The result shows that the experimental value of the target system can be accurately predicted by considering the cross section, experimental error, and calculation error.