ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Excelsior University student section awarded community education grant
The American Nuclear Society Student Section at Excelsior University in Albany, N.Y., was awarded a $5,000 grant from the ANS Student Section Strategic Fund initiative for its program, Empowering Tomorrow’s Nuclear Innovators: A Collaborative Approach to Nuclear Technology Education and Awareness.
Zoltán István Böröczki, Boglárka Babcsány, János Endre Maróti, Máté Szieberth
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 8 | August 2023 | Pages 1545-1563
Technical papers from: PHYSOR 2022 | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2167469
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Most of the codes available for homogenized group constant generation for deterministic transport calculations apply the approximation of scalar flux weighting during energy group condensation of higher-order anisotropic scattering matrices. In this paper, we point out the bias caused by scalar flux weighting of linearly anisotropic scattering matrices in the result of SP3 and S12 calculations. An infinite pin cell was homogenized with Serpent 2 and ERANOS ECCO to compare group constants with different energy group condensation options. Serpent 2 applies scalar flux while ERANOS ECCO performs current weighting of the linearly anisotropic scattering matrices. Three simple reactor models were built assuming different core sizes using standard rectangular assemblies with 15 ×15 fuel pins to analyze the effect of the various weighting options. Diffusion, SP3, and S12 calculations were performed for the three models using group constants generated with Serpent 2 and ERANOS ECCO. The effect of scalar flux weighting of linearly anisotropic scattering matrices in higher-order transport calculations is shown by comparing the decrease in reactivity due to the decreased reactor size and the assembly power distribution to reference results obtained with Serpent 2 Monte Carlo calculations. Analogous results were observed during the extension of our investigations to a VVER-440 benchmark and the Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME) Training Reactor. We also studied the effect of increasing the number of groups in these examples. Neglecting higher than linearly anisotropic scattering and indirect application of diffusion coefficients in higher-order transport calculations is advised with few-group structures if angular flux-moment spectra-weighted higher-order scattering matrices cannot be generated. Although in few-group calculations, it can lead to more accurate higher-order transport solutions than applying scalar flux–weighted linearly anisotropic scattering matrices, by increasing the number of energy groups, the distorting effect of scalar flux weighting can also be decreased.
