ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
Hash Hashemian: Visionary leadership
As Dr. Hashem M. “Hash” Hashemian prepares to step into his term as President of the American Nuclear Society, he is clear that he wants to make the most of this unique moment.
A groundswell in public approval of nuclear is finding a home in growing governmental support that is backed by a tailwind of technological innovation. “Now is a good time to be in nuclear,” Hashemian said, as he explained the criticality of this moment and what he hoped to accomplish as president.
Gregory D. Wyss, Adam D. Williams
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 1 | June 2023 | Pages S80-S94
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2129224
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Providing adequate security to civilian nuclear materials and facilities exemplifies the long-standing, dynamic challenge of addressing the potential for facility damage under operational uncertainty. Estimating attack likelihood with enough precision to be useful and actionable for security risk management is philosophically, scientifically, and practically challenging. In response, this paper discusses the conceptual and analytical shortcomings of various approaches to calculating the likelihood of attack as a foundational element of security risk management. From these shortcomings emerge a set of characteristics that can guide the creation of alternative concepts that provide more robust and actionable security risk management approaches better aligned with the Ievolutionary growth in civilian nuclear facilities. Such broader conceptions would support movement from traditional interpretations of probability of attack toward more nuanced and complex depictions to enhance security risk management.