ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
High-temperature plumbing and advanced reactors
The use of nuclear fission power and its role in impacting climate change is hotly debated. Fission advocates argue that short-term solutions would involve the rapid deployment of Gen III+ nuclear reactors, like Vogtle-3 and -4, while long-term climate change impact would rely on the creation and implementation of Gen IV reactors, “inherently safe” reactors that use passive laws of physics and chemistry rather than active controls such as valves and pumps to operate safely. While Gen IV reactors vary in many ways, one thing unites nearly all of them: the use of exotic, high-temperature coolants. These fluids, like molten salts and liquid metals, can enable reactor engineers to design much safer nuclear reactors—ultimately because the boiling point of each fluid is extremely high. Fluids that remain liquid over large temperature ranges can provide good heat transfer through many demanding conditions, all with minimal pressurization. Although the most apparent use for these fluids is advanced fission power, they have the potential to be applied to other power generation sources such as fusion, thermal storage, solar, or high-temperature process heat.1–3
Brian Cohn, Todd Noel, Jeffrey Cardoni, Troy Haskin, Douglas Osborn, Tunc Aldemir
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 1 | June 2023 | Pages S45-S56
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2177076
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Nuclear security relies on the method of vital area identification (VAI) to determine which locations within the nuclear power plant (NPP) need to be protected from radiological sabotage. The VAI methodology uses fault trees (FTs) and event trees (ETs) to identify locations in the NPP that contain vital equipment: structures and components that may result in reactor significant core damage if direct or indirect sabotage occurred. However, the traditional FT/ET process cannot fully capture the dynamics of NPP systems and mitigating measures at play. Existing safety systems or possible operator procedures may be able to avert or mitigate core damage despite the loss of one or more vital areas. Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment (DPRA) methodologies are those that, unlike traditional probabilistic risk assessment, explicitly consider time effects when modeling a system. One common DPRA methodology is that of the use of dynamic event trees (DETs) that drive computer models of a system with user-specified branching conditions to account for uncertainties in a scenario. The DPRA process allows analysts to explore the uncertainties and state space of a scenario in a systematic fashion. A scenario was developed that uses the novel leading simulator/trailing simulator methodology to perform a DET analysis of a combined nuclear safety and nuclear security analysis. The scenario under consideration models the successful sabotage of a vital area by adversaries and determines the effects of timing and the extent of sabotage, as well as possible recovery actions, on the state of the plant. The results of this integrated analysis include the timing and extent of core damage as well as the extent of any radiological release that may occur as a result of sabotage.