ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
H. Naik, S. P. Dange, R. J. Singh, W. Jang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 6 | June 2023 | Pages 1133-1158
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2142433
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the thermal neutron–induced fission of 233U, the cumulative and independent yields of various fission products within the mass ranges of 77 to 109 and 123 to 155 have been measured by using an off-line gamma-ray spectrometric technique. The lower yields of 86Br and 136I than usual trend indicate the formation of delayed neutron emitters 87Br and 137I. From the cumulative yields, the post-neutron mass yield distribution was obtained after applying the charge distribution correction. The data from the present and earlier work of our laboratory in the 233U(nth,f) reaction were compared with similar data of 232,235U(nth,f) and 238U(n,f) reactions to examine the effect of mass difference of the fissioning systems on the fine structure of the mass yield distribution. The mass yield distribution in the 233U(nth,f) reaction was also compared with those of 229Th(nth,f), 241Pu(nth,f), and 245Cm(nth,f) reactions to examine the effect of charge and mass difference of the fissioning systems and also to examine the different behaviors of standard I and standard II asymmetric modes of fission.