ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Diversification and the common ground
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
Who would have thought, just a few years ago, that we would see so many long-standing barriers to new nuclear development falling like dominoes? Public opinion, policy, regulatory reform, finance and investment, design maturity, nuclear fuel enrichment, and fuel fabrication capacity have all advanced with remarkable speed in the United States.
Conventional wisdom holds that the most effective way to scale up the nuclear supply chain is to do so strategically, matching investments to the needs of reactor developers.
Rodolfo M. Ferrer, Joshua M. Hykes
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 2 | February 2023 | Pages 333-350
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2053491
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Spatially Dependent Self-Shielding (SDSS) method has been implemented into CASMO5 within the framework of Equivalence Theory. The Optimal Two-Term Rational (OTTR) approximation is extended in the SDSS method to the Stoker-Weiss treatment of concentric annular fuel subdivisions. Reference fuel-to-fuel probabilities are required by the OTTR and obtained by performing a series of fixed-source, two-dimensional transport calculations for individual pin cell types using the method of characteristics. Several algorithms used in searching for the OTTR coefficients are evaluated with the goal of obtaining the best practical accuracy at minimal computational cost. Numerical results are presented that provide a comparison of various choices of search algorithms and show improved accuracy obtained by increasing the degrees of freedom in the rational approximation. Spatial profiles of the 238U microscopic absorption cross sections in the resonance range obtained using the Distributed Resonance Integral (DRI) and SDSS methods are compared to reference results from Monte Carlo calculations. The comparison highlights the inherent advantages of SDSS over the previous DRI method.