ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The RAIN scale: A good intention that falls short
Radiation protection specialists agree that clear communication of radiation risks remains a vexing challenge that cannot be solved solely by finding new ways to convey technical information.
Earlier this year, an article in Nuclear News described a new radiation risk communication tool, known as the Radiation Index, or, RAIN (“Let it RAIN: A new approach to radiation communication,” NN, Jan. 2025, p. 36). The authors of the article created the RAIN scale to improve radiation risk communication to the general public who are not well-versed in important aspects of radiation exposures, including radiation dose quantities, units, and values; associated health consequences; and the benefits derived from radiation exposures.
Aaron J. Reynolds, Todd S. Palmer
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 1 | January 2023 | Pages 45-73
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2097565
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We use the deterministic neutron transport code QuasiMolto to simulate steady-state operation of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE). Comparisons are made to similar results from the MOST benchmark, the MOOSE-based code Moltres, and the design calculations for the MSRE. In the course of these comparisons, we calculate a value of 0.1799 for the graphite-to-fuel power density ratio, which differs significantly from that seen in other works. We also find uniform graphite heating inadequate to reproduce the characteristic graphite temperature distribution of the MSRE. Leveraging the multilevel projective methodology of QuasiMolto, the influence of transport effects on the modeled problem is found to produce average and maximum group flux variations of 2% to 5% and 30%, respectively, with a 12% variation in the reactivity loss due to delayed neutron precursor drift.