ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
A closer look at the initial NLIC selections—Part 2
In January, the Department of Energy announced its new Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus (NLIC) program, inviting states via a request for information to express their interest in hosting a facility supporting work from the front to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
By April, 26 states had expressed interest in hosting such a facility. At the end of July, the DOE signed memorandums of understanding with five states—Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah—to more closely explore the possibilities of state-federal partnerships. These MOUs are not firm commitments from either the federal or state governments. Time will tell which—if any—of the five states develop projects through the program. In the meantime, today, we are taking a close look at what Utah, Idaho, Tennessee can offer in terms of a preexisting nuclear sector that could support new fuel cycle developments.
Junghyun Bae, Robert S. Bean
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 10 | October 2022 | Pages 1224-1235
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2055700
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In pool-type research reactors, the fuel core is placed in a large open pool of water, and it is consistently cooled by natural circulation. To meet the increasing demands of reactor-based research, i.e., neutron irradiation and isotope production, many institutes have been considering upgrading the designed power levels of their research reactors to maximize their utility. However, increasing operating power levels without replacing the major components of the reactor system is challenging because two important analyses must be extensively performed: (1) neutron transport analysis for nuclear fission and decay heat generation and (2) thermohydraulic analysis for heat removal in the core. In this paper, we investigate thermohydraulic limits on the maximum power of the Purdue University research reactor (PUR-1) using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations which are coupled with the results from Monte Carlo neutron transport simulations. We design a PUR-1 fuel assembly, which is designated as the hottest one for CFD simulations, that includes a narrow, rectangular, and upward coolant channel. Here we demonstrate that the thermohydraulic limit for PUR-1 core power is 350 kW without changing the coolant system. Given a conservative safety margin, however, the estimated maximum power level is decreased to 170 kW. In the end, the results of two additional cooling systems—guide pipe and lowered coolant temperature—are presented to demonstrate the potential of advanced cooling capacity. They would enable reactors to operate at higher core power levels.