ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
A closer look at the initial NLIC selections—Part 2
In January, the Department of Energy announced its new Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus (NLIC) program, inviting states via a request for information to express their interest in hosting a facility supporting work from the front to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
By April, 26 states had expressed interest in hosting such a facility. At the end of July, the DOE signed memorandums of understanding with five states—Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah—to more closely explore the possibilities of state-federal partnerships. These MOUs are not firm commitments from either the federal or state governments. Time will tell which—if any—of the five states develop projects through the program. In the meantime, today, we are taking a close look at what Utah, Idaho, Tennessee can offer in terms of a preexisting nuclear sector that could support new fuel cycle developments.
Donghao He, William Walters
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 9 | September 2022 | Pages 1101-1113
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2049991
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The combined fission matrix (CFM) method is a newly developed neutron transport theory. This method estimates the fission matrix of the reactor core or spent fuel pool by combining a set of database fission matrices. The RAPID neutron transport code based on the CFM routine was developed originally for the spent fuel storage system and has been applied to the reactor core calculation in recent years. It can perform high-fidelity whole-core transport calculations within minutes. However, since the fission matrix database is obtained from Monte Carlo calculations, the uncertainty in the fission matrix will inevitably pass to its eigenvalue and eigenvector. The RAPID code also uses the fission matrix homogenization and interpolation techniques to further improve the calculation efficiency. Therefore, it is difficult to establish a relationship between the fission matrix elements’ uncertainty and the resulting eigenvalue and eigenvector uncertainties. This paper proposes two uncertainty analysis methods to obtain the eigenvalue and eigenvector uncertainties. The fission matrix resampling method resamples the database fission matrix elements according to each individual uncertainty. This method could generate many fission matrix databases at little additional costs and analyze the eigenvalue and eigenvector uncertainties from these resampled fission matrix coefficients. The analog uncertainty analysis method predicts the eigenvalue uncertainty from the uncertainty of the total fission rate in a fixed-source calculation, which yields a fission matrix column. Both uncertainty analysis methods have been validated against the reference brute-force calculations on a single-pin model and the BEAVRS whole-core model. It shows that the fission matrix resampling method could well estimate the uncertainties in the fission matrix eigenvalue and eigenvector. The analog uncertainty analysis method can accurately predict the eigenvalue uncertainty, which provides a guideline for the number of neutron histories simulated per fixed-source calculation.