ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Kim Wei Chin, Rei Kimura, Hiroshi Sagara, Kosuke Tanabe
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 7 | July 2022 | Pages 852-872
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.2018927
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Past studies validated the feasibility of the photofission reaction ratio (PFRR) method using both Gaussian and bremsstrahlung photons to estimate the isotopic composition of nuclear fuel materials without relying on their self-generated neutron information. However, the current PFRR method cannot solve a multinuclide system with more than two nuclides because the instability of the inverse matrix increases with the addition of the number of nuclides. Thus, this research proposes a numerical method for solving the simultaneous equations of a three-nuclide system onto PFRR to estimate the isotopic composition of nuclides. The results show good reproducibility with all cases maintained within a 10% isotopic composition difference except cases 6 and 7 of the first two photon energy combination schemes with maximum composition differences of 15.6% and 13.9% for 10% actual composition, respectively. A 20% actual composition of case 5 for the second photon energy combination scheme has a deviation of 10.6%, which is slightly larger than the 10% composition difference too. Out of three photon energy combination schemes, 6 MeV – 6.5 MeV – 11 MeV has the highest coefficient of determination for all three nuclides and the smallest deviation of below 10% composition difference. Random sampling with normal distribution was performed on the loss to photofission particles from MCNP with 200 sets for each 10 cases on the 6 MeV – 7 MeV – 11 MeV photon energy combination to study the stochastic errors. The isotopic compositions were calculated with the same numerical method, and the difference between the estimated and actual compositions that resulted were fitted with R. The fitting results show good agreement within 91.5% confidence intervals.