ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
H. Naik, S. P. Dange, R. J. Singh, W. Jang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 7 | July 2022 | Pages 824-851
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.2025298
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Mass chain yield distribution has been done in the thermal neutron–induced fission of 239Pu by measuring the cumulative yields of various fission products within the mass range of 78 to 159 and the independent yields of a few products. An off-line gamma-ray spectrometric technique was used to measure the gamma-ray activities of the fission products. From the measured values of the cumulative yields, the post-neutron mass chain yield distribution was obtained after applying the charge distribution correction. Data from the present and earlier work of our laboratory in the 239Pu(nth,f) reaction were compared with similar data of 238,241Pu(nth,f) and 240Pu(n,f) reactions, and it was found that the fine structures of the mass yield distributions are similar. The mass yield distribution in the 239Pu(nth,f) reaction was also compared with those of 229Th(nth,f) and 252Cf(SF) reactions to examine the effect of charge and mass difference of the fissioning systems on the mass yield distribution. It was found that the asymmetric standard I mode of fission is favorable in the 238,239,241Pu(nth,f) and 240Pu(n,f) reactions whereas the standard II mode is favorable in the 229Th(nth,f) and 252Cf(SF) reactions.