ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
A closer look at the initial NLIC selections—Part 2
In January, the Department of Energy announced its new Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus (NLIC) program, inviting states via a request for information to express their interest in hosting a facility supporting work from the front to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
By April, 26 states had expressed interest in hosting such a facility. At the end of July, the DOE signed memorandums of understanding with five states—Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah—to more closely explore the possibilities of state-federal partnerships. These MOUs are not firm commitments from either the federal or state governments. Time will tell which—if any—of the five states develop projects through the program. In the meantime, today, we are taking a close look at what Utah, Idaho, Tennessee can offer in terms of a preexisting nuclear sector that could support new fuel cycle developments.
Patrick J. O’Neal, Sunil S. Chirayath, Qi Cheng
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 7 | July 2022 | Pages 811-823
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.2024037
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A nuclear forensics technique, based on the maximum likelihood method, for the attribution of reactor type, fuel burnup, and time since irradiation (TSI) of separated pure plutonium (Pu) samples was previously developed at Texas A&M University. The method utilized measured values of ten intra-elemental isotope ratios in the Pu sample and a large database consisting of the values for these ratios as a function of the three attributes: reactor type, fuel burnup, and TSI. However, this method failed for Pu samples with mixed attributes. Hence, a new technique based on machine learning methods was developed that matched the capabilities of the previous maximum likelihood method for pure Pu samples. This new methodology used support vector machines for reactor-type discrimination and Gaussian process regression for fuel burnup quantification. The TSI was calculated analytically using the predicted reactor type and fuel burnup. This new method holds great potential for the attribution of mixed Pu samples.