ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Diversification and the common ground
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
Who would have thought, just a few years ago, that we would see so many long-standing barriers to new nuclear development falling like dominoes? Public opinion, policy, regulatory reform, finance and investment, design maturity, nuclear fuel enrichment, and fuel fabrication capacity have all advanced with remarkable speed in the United States.
Conventional wisdom holds that the most effective way to scale up the nuclear supply chain is to do so strategically, matching investments to the needs of reactor developers.
Abhishek Chakraborty, Suneet Singh, M. P. S. Fernando
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 6 | June 2022 | Pages 715-734
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.2011670
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Large nuclear reactors operating in the thermal spectrum are prone to both global and regional oscillations in power due to variation of 135Xe concentration. These power oscillations are self-stabilizing up to a certain operating power level, beyond which spatial power control becomes necessary for suppressing these oscillations. Especially for large pressurized heavy water reactors (PHWRs), which are natural uranium–fueled reactors using heavy water as coolant and moderator, the modes of xenon instabilities decide the extent and scheme for spatial power control. In this paper, the effect of spatial control on the bifurcation characteristics is demonstrated using a two-region model. The error signal for movement of the reactivity device has a global component for bulk power control and a local component for regional power control. The amount of regional power control determines the power level at which the spatial xenon oscillations stabilize. Using bifurcation analysis, it is found that in case of limited regional control, both supercritical and subcritical Hopf bifurcations exist, whereas in the case of increased regional control only supercritical Hopf bifurcations exist. However, these supercritical Hopf oscillations are due to time lag in control and have short timescales and lower amplitudes as compared to xenon oscillations. Hence, a proper choice of spatial control enables a PHWR to operate at rated full power capacity without any spatial Xenon instability.