ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
A closer look at the initial NLIC selections—Part 2
In January, the Department of Energy announced its new Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus (NLIC) program, inviting states via a request for information to express their interest in hosting a facility supporting work from the front to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
By April, 26 states had expressed interest in hosting such a facility. At the end of July, the DOE signed memorandums of understanding with five states—Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah—to more closely explore the possibilities of state-federal partnerships. These MOUs are not firm commitments from either the federal or state governments. Time will tell which—if any—of the five states develop projects through the program. In the meantime, today, we are taking a close look at what Utah, Idaho, Tennessee can offer in terms of a preexisting nuclear sector that could support new fuel cycle developments.
Sadek Hossain Nishat, Md. Hossain Sahadath, Farhana Islam Farha
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 5 | May 2022 | Pages 623-636
Technical Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.2003644
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A thermal-hydraulic study of an isolated Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactor (AGR) nuclear fuel rod with smooth and rough cladding surfaces is carried out by computational fluid dynamics simulation and analytical calculation. Square transverse ribs of various pitch/height ratios (6:12) are considered for the rough surface. Parameters of the rough cladding surface show greater values than those for the smooth surface except for surface heat flux. It is found that only the average surface heat flux increases with an increasing pitch/height ratio. On the other hand, the average values of wall shear stress, Darcy friction factor, skin friction factor, convective heat transfer coefficient, Nusselt number, and thermal-hydraulic performance decrease with an increasing pitch/height ratio. The simulated results are found to be very close to the values obtained from an analytical calculation. Also, square and circular ribs are compared. The circular ribs show lower values of convective heat transfer coefficient and wall shear stress but permit high surface heat flux. The results of this study will help researchers comprehend the effect of cladding surface roughness on fuel rod thermal behavior.