ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
A closer look at the initial NLIC selections—Part 2
In January, the Department of Energy announced its new Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus (NLIC) program, inviting states via a request for information to express their interest in hosting a facility supporting work from the front to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
By April, 26 states had expressed interest in hosting such a facility. At the end of July, the DOE signed memorandums of understanding with five states—Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah—to more closely explore the possibilities of state-federal partnerships. These MOUs are not firm commitments from either the federal or state governments. Time will tell which—if any—of the five states develop projects through the program. In the meantime, today, we are taking a close look at what Utah, Idaho, Tennessee can offer in terms of a preexisting nuclear sector that could support new fuel cycle developments.
Fabiano Gibson Daud Thulu, Ayah Elshahat, Mohamed Hassan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 5 | May 2022 | Pages 568-583
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.2009984
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is crucial to do safety evaluation of different postulated transient scenarios in actual nuclear power plants (NPPs). Some of the common analyzed scenarios are primary coolant tube rupture and station blackout (SBO). In this research, it was supposed that after establishment of a steady-state condition, an instantaneous guillotine large-break loss-of-coolant accident (LB-LOCA) of 850-mm inside diameter in one of the reactor vessel cold legs occurred, accompanied with SBO. The event progression and the variation of different reactor parameters like loop pressures, mass flow rates, fuel and clad temperature, injection rate of accumulators (ACCs), decay, and reactor power were investigated using the RELAP5/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.5 thermal-hydraulic program. The reactor consequences due to availability and unavailability of passive ACCs were compared. These kinds of analyses assist in estimating the time available to perform operator safety actions. This in turn aids in emergency planning and severe accident management. The results reveal that fuel damage decreased after the introduction of ACCs. Actuation of ACCs at their actuation setpoints provided core cooling by injecting water into the reactor core. However, ACCs alone are inadequate to contain long-term core cooling during a persistent LB-LOCA. The results obtained in the research were compared with MELCOR 2.1 and ASTEC V1.3, and a cohesive agreement was obtained. Therefore, RELAP5/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.5 is capable of modeling a LB-LOCA and SBO in VVER-1000, and it provides a significant analytical capability of safety systems for specialists in the field in NPP safety.