ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Texas A&M welcomes uranium conversion research
The Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) has signed a research agreement with Quantum Leap Energy (QLE) “to advance and de-risk the commercial production of high-purity uranium hexafluoride (UF6).”
QLE is an Austin, Texas–based subsidiary of ASP Isotopes (ASPI), which is developing an isotope enrichment platform for applications in nuclear energy, nuclear medicine, and semiconductors. QLE specializes in the uranium conversion step of the nuclear fuel cycle—the conversion of yellowcake uranium concentrate (U3O8) into UF6 prior to enrichment.
E. Blain, Y. Danon, D. P. Barry, B. E. Epping, A. Youmans, M. J. Rapp, A. M. Daskalakis, R. C. Block
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 2 | February 2022 | Pages 121-132
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1961542
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron scattering from a copper sample was measured at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute utilizing the quasi-differential method. The measurement spanned the energy range from 0.5 to 20 MeV using the high-energy scattering system and from 2 keV to 0.5 MeV using the new mid-energy scattering system. Copper was selected as a material of interest to measure due to large discrepancies between experiments and simulations of the Zeus benchmark. The Zeus benchmark consists of a copper reflected highly enriched uranium system, and the angular distribution of copper scattering was thought to potentially be the cause of the discrepancy. The copper measurements found differences in the scattering response particularly in the incident energy region from 1 to 2 MeV for the high-energy measurement and from 2 to 4 keV in the mid-energy system. These differences are particularly noticeable at angles near 90 deg in the high-energy system and back angles in the mid-energy system. Additionally, for ENDF/B-VIII.0 there is a large discrepancy at the forward angle in the energy range around 0.5 MeV. For these reasons, a new evaluation of copper scattering utilizing these results is recommended and perhaps could help to improve the agreement with the Zeus benchmarks.